Headmin Rulings
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
Внимание: Эта страница Модерируемая. На неё можно ссылаться в случаях обжалования Бана или подачи жалобы. |
This is a compilation of headmin rulings on various policy questions asked by players. This page does not replace the rules and whenever possible the rules should be referred to instead of this page. The rulings listed here can be referenced in ban appeals and admin complaints.
Please note: Some of these questions are for very niche/specific situations. Some of them cannot be applied the same way to every situation.
General Rulings[править | править код]
IC/OOC Rulings[править | править код]
Antagonist Rulings[править | править код]
Admin-Related Rulings[править | править код]
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Adminshopping | Admin shopping is defined as going to different admins until you get a favorable ruling. It's highly frowned upon, don't do it. | Sep 27, 2017 | Feemjmeem / Agreed with by other headmins |
Admin intervention without anyone ahelping | It's allowed. | Sep 26, 2017 | Ausops |
Killing nonhostile admin spawned entities | Against the rules, don't do it. | Sep 25, 2017 | PKPenguin321 |
Using OOC to promote yourself for headmin elections | One or two lines of text is fine, spamming is not. | Sep 04, 2017 | PKPenguin321 |
Escalation Rulings[править | править код]
Security Rulings[править | править код]
Silicon and Drone Related Rulings[править | править код]
AI/Cyborg Rulings[править | править код]
Drone Rulings[править | править код]
Mostly defunct, as drones have since been removed, reworked, and re-introduced into the codebase.
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Drone Policy Guidelines | Guide to drone policy. | May 20, 2015 | Stickymayhem |
Are drones valid? | Only if they do something to annoy you. Mass killing drones for no reason is not okay. | Sep 14, 2017 | KorPhaeron |
Drones and permabrig | You can go in to fix damage. You might still get dronebanned if you let people out, it will likely be handled case-by-case. | Oct 17, 2016 | |
Drones and Powersinks | Drones cannot destroy powersinks under the same logic of them not being able to defuse bombs or stop plasma floods. | Aug 31, 2017 | Ausops |
Drones and atmospherics | Improving atmos is okay. Cutting pipes/turning off plasma is not okay. Fighting the symptoms of plasma in the distro is fine though. | Sep 21, 2015 | Shadowlight213 |
Do silicons count as a being under drone laws? | Yes, treat them as any other crew member. | Sep 19, 2014 | QuartzCrystal |
Law Interpretation Rulings[править | править код]
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Do AIs need a definition of Syndicate agent? | No, they know by default what a Syndicate agent is. This also applies to other antagonists. | Jun 23, 2014 | Hornygranny |
AI's law zero | The law zero that a traitor AI gets means that it is an antagonist and it can ignore all other laws. | Oct 27, 2015 | KorPhaeron |
Potential Law One Violations | "Prioritizing "potential future law violations" is a fucking terrible idea, since it makes silicons able to handwave basically any law two request with "yeah but if i let you in there you might potentially attack somebody inside, law 1 violation!!!"" | Jun 06, 2017 | PKPenguin321 |
Define what classifies harm as willing, or change asimov++ law one | Acceptance of risk is not the same thing as acceptance of harm - Silicons should act to minimise harm not explicitly consented to as much as they are able - if in doubt, ask the human. For more specific examples, see the full response to the thread. | Nov 05, 2022 | Spookuni |
MRP Rulings[править | править код]
Archived Rulings[править | править код]
For Headmin Rulings that are no longer relevant, either due to being overruled or not applicable via code changes.