Участник:Dragomagol/HeadminRulings: различия между версиями
Перейти к навигации
Перейти к поиску
imported>Dragomagol |
imported>Dragomagol |
||
Строка 86: | Строка 86: | ||
|[https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=12517#p326955 If two people are on the same team and have an argument, it must follow escalation rules/rule 1. It cannot be detrimental to your team.] | |[https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=12517#p326955 If two people are on the same team and have an argument, it must follow escalation rules/rule 1. It cannot be detrimental to your team.] | ||
|Aug 15, 2017 | |Aug 15, 2017 | ||
|PKPenguin321/Ausops | |PKPenguin321 / Ausops | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Trying to get converted to team antags''' | |'''Trying to get converted to team antags''' |
Версия от 00:12, 17 ноября 2021
This is a compilation of headmin rulings on various policy questions asked by players. This page does not replace the rules and whenever possible the rules should be referred to instead of this page. The rulings listed here can be referenced in ban appeals and admin complaints.
Please note: Some of these questions are for very niche/specific situations. Some of them cannot be applied the same way to every situation.
Rule 1 Related Rulings
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Mass identity duplication | Changing many people into one person via genetics/other methods as a nonantagonist. It can happen every once in a while, just don't do it every single round. | Oct 12, 2017 | Armhulenn |
Deleting security records as a nonantag | Don't do it every round. Don't use a sec/head position to do it. Don't use it to metagrudge. | Aug 23, 2017 | Ausops |
Validity when killing pets | If you perform an action which has zero benefit to you other than making others upset (like killing Ian) I will ban you if you adminhelp when someone kills you. | Dec 30, 2017 | KorPhaeron |
Cutting down christmas trees/general asshole behavior for no reason | If you perform an action which has zero benefit to you other than making others upset (like chopping down the Christmas trees while they’re enabled) I will ban you if you adminhelp when someone kills you. | Dec 26, 2018 | Nervere |
Rule 2 Related Rulings
Rule 3 Related Rulings
Rule 4 Related Rulings
General Rulings
Escalation Rulings
Security Rulings
Silicon and Drone Related Rulings
Law Interpretation Rulings
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Law interpretation and do not state this law clauses | There is room for interpretation in some cases. Be consistent in your interpretation of the laws. | Aug 22, 2017 | Ausops |
Do AIs need a definition of Syndicate agent? | No, they know by default what a Syndicate agent is. This also applies to other antagonists. | Jun 23, 2014 | Hornygranny |
Do purged silicons have to act like a crewmember? | Purged silicons are subject to rule one and standard escalation. | Dec 22, 2014 | Stickymayhem |
Discussion on paladin lawset: Part 2, the electric boogaloo | Most relevant post is by HotelBravoLima, which applies to law interpretation in general. "Even doing something consistent with an interpretation of laws isn't good if you're being an OOC dick about it to such an extreme, that's the policy." | May 02, 2015 | HotelBravoLima |
Tyrant module discussion | Just general discussion on the tyrant lawset. | ||
AI's law zero | The law zero that a traitor AI gets means that it is an antagonist and it can ignore all other laws. | Oct 27, 2015 | KorPhaeron |
Are AI laws applied retroactively? | No. You'll have to read this thread to understand it, the question doesn't really provide enough context. | Apr 04, 2016 | Hornygranny |
If a borg linked to a rogue AI is emagged then does the emagged laws or AI law zero take priority? | Very niche case and is probably impossible since emags should sever the connection to the AI. Starmute made a good post on AI law priority if you are confused. | ||
Potential Law One Violations | "Prioritizing "potential future law violations" is a fucking terrible idea, since it makes silicons able to handwave basically any law two request with "yeah but if i let you in there you might potentially attack somebody inside, law 1 violation!!!"" | Jun 06, 2017 | PKPenguin321 |
Make "Do not state this law" a valid silicon policy law | No, for the variety of reasons that have been said in this thread. | Aug 25, 2019 | Wubli |
MRP Rulings
Policy | Ruling | Date | Headmin |
---|---|---|---|
Murderboning Specifics on MRP Servers | Some roles can do it, some cant, and there are grey areas. | Mar 18, 2020 | Coconutwarrior97 |
Promotions of prisoners to security | If you have a decent enough reason for it such as needing people to fight a blob sure, otherwise no. | Sep 20, 2020 | Coconutwarrior97 |
"Gun Cargo" on MRP | Needs a good IC reason, can't just be because "We're bored". Good faith gimmicks are still allowed, but you can't murder sec for trying to take your guns away. | May 16, 2021 | Coconutwarrior97 |
Powergaming on MRP | MRP players are expected to prioritize the story of the shift over tactical advantages. MRP admins are encouraged to engage sec, antags, and other crew that are going overboard with gear that doesn't fit the current circumstances (especially gear outside the scope of their job (as opposed to job products like plants and slime extracts)) and discuss the importance of pacing and sportsmanship. | Nov 11, 2021 | RaveRadbury |